↓ Skip to main content

Biocompatible Amphiphilic Hydrogel–Solid Dimer Particles as Colloidal Surfactants

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Nano, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biocompatible Amphiphilic Hydrogel–Solid Dimer Particles as Colloidal Surfactants
Published in
ACS Nano, December 2017
DOI 10.1021/acsnano.7b03110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong Chen, Esther Amstad, Chun-Xia Zhao, Liheng Cai, Jing Fan, Qiushui Chen, Mingtan Hai, Stephan Koehler, Huidan Zhang, Fuxin Liang, Zhenzhong Yang, David A. Weitz

Abstract

Emulsions of two immiscible liquids can slowly coalesce over time when stabilized by surfactant molecules. Pickering emulsions stabilized by colloidal particles can be much more stable. Here, we fabricate biocompatible amphiphilic dimer particles using a hydrogel, a strongly hydrophilic material, and achieve large contrast in the wetting properties of the two bulbs, resulting in enhanced stabilization of emulsions. We generate monodisperse single emulsions of alginate and shellac solution in oil using a flow-focusing microfluidics device. Shellac precipitates from water and forms a solid bulb at the periphery of the droplet when the emulsion is exposed to acid. Molecular interactions result in amphiphilic dimer particles that consist of two joined bulbs: one hydrogel bulb of alginate in water and the other hydrophobic bulb of shellac. Alginate in the hydrogel compartment can be cross-linked using calcium cations to obtain stable particles. Analogous to surfactant molecules at the interface, the resultant amphiphilic particles stand at the water/oil interface with the hydrogel bulb submerged in water and the hydrophobic bulb in oil and are thus able to stabilize both water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions, making these amphiphilic hydrogel-solid particles ideal colloidal surfactants for various applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 42%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 14 22%
Materials Science 8 13%
Chemical Engineering 7 11%
Engineering 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,579,736
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#11,501
of 12,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,614
of 439,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#191
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.