↓ Skip to main content

Distribution and reproductive plasticity of Gyrinicola batrachiensis (Oxyuroidea: Pharyngodonidae) in tadpoles of five anuran species

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Distribution and reproductive plasticity of Gyrinicola batrachiensis (Oxyuroidea: Pharyngodonidae) in tadpoles of five anuran species
Published in
Parasitology Research, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00436-017-5723-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelcie C. Pierce, Ryan P. Shannon, Matthew G. Bolek

Abstract

Previous studies on Gyrinicola batrachiensis indicate that these pinworms have distinct reproductive strategies dependent on the development time to metamorphosis of their anuran tadpole hosts. In tadpoles of amphibian species with short developmental periods (a few weeks), female nematodes reproduce parthenogenetically, and only produce thick-shelled eggs used as transmission agents from tadpole to tadpole. In contrast, nematodes in tadpoles with longer larval developmental periods (months to years) reproduce by haplodiploidy, and females produce thick-shelled as well as autoinfective thin-shelled eggs. However, recent investigations on the haplodiploidy strain of G. batrachiensis indicate that plasticity exists in the ability of these nematodes to produce thin-shelled autoinfective eggs when these nematodes infect tadpoles of co-occurring amphibian species. Yet, little information is available on the potential mechanism for this reproductive plasticity because few co-occurring amphibian species have been examined for the reproductive strategies of these nematodes. Therefore, our goals were to document field host specificity and reproductive strategies of nematode populations in tadpoles of five co-occurring amphibian species that varied in their larval developmental periods. Additionally, we evaluated adult worm morphology from each infected amphibian species to assess any differences in worm development and reproductive strategy of pinworm populations in different amphibian species. Of the five amphibian species examined, four were infected with the haplodiploid strain of G. batrachiensis. Prevalence of G. batrachiensis ranged from a high of 83% in Acris blandchardi to a low of 15% in Pseudacris clarkii; whereas mean intensity was highest for Rana sphenocephala (10 ± 10.36) and lowest for Hyla chrysoscelis (3.23 ± 3.35). Prevalence appeared to be controlled by tadpole ecology and life history, while mean intensity appeared to be controlled by tadpole physiology and worm reproductive strategy, but not necessarily the developmental period of each anuran species. G. batrachiensis observed in long developing tadpoles of R. sphenocephala had high mean intensities and conformed to the haplodiploidy reproductive strategy with both male and female worms being present, and females produced thick-shelled and thin-shelled eggs. In contrast, tadpoles of A. blanchardi, H. chrysoscelis, and P. clarkii, which varied in their developmental times from long to short, had relatively low mean intensities and contained both male and female G. batrachiensis. However, female worms only produced thick-shelled eggs in these hosts. Importantly, morphological differences existed among female worms recovered from R. sphenocephala and female worms recovered from A. blanchardi tadpoles with long developmental periods. These data strongly suggest that when the haplodiploidy strain of G. batrachiensis is shared by tadpoles of different amphibian species, species-specific differences in interactions between these nematodes and their development in different amphibian host species have a strong influence on the reproductive plasticity of these nematodes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,780,777
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#125
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,683
of 441,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#1
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.