↓ Skip to main content

日本人用ベジタリアンフードガイドを用いた栄養教育介入の効果

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本人用ベジタリアンフードガイドを用いた栄養教育介入の効果
Published in
Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association, April 2013
DOI 10.11379/jjda.56.267
Authors

仲本 桂子, 渡邉 早苗, 工藤 秀機, ノパラタナウォン サム, 蒲原 聖可, ラダック ティム, 土田 満, 宮﨑 恭一, サーシャン ディリープ, 田中 明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association
#19
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,602
of 213,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them