Title |
Efficacy of transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation in treatment of children with primary nocturnal enuresis: a randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatric Nephrology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00467-014-3039-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh, Lida Sharifi-Rad, Sarah Mozafarpour, Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian |
Abstract |
Electrical stimulation has been used as an alternative therapy for adult urinary syndromes and for children with constipation. We have evaluated the safety and efficacy of interferential (IF) electrical stimulation in children with nocturnal enuresis (NE). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 20% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,619,583
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#295
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,241
of 352,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.