Title |
Monitoring ectomycorrhizal fungi at large scales for science, forest management, fungal conservation and environmental policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13595-014-0447-4 |
Authors |
Laura M. Suz, Nadia Barsoum, Sue Benham, Chris Cheffings, Filipa Cox, Louise Hackett, Alan G. Jones, Gregory M. Mueller, David Orme, Walter Seidling, Sietse Van Der Linde, Martin I. Bidartondo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 26% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 26 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,601,770
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#725
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,794
of 360,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.