↓ Skip to main content

Metabolism of a sea lamprey pesticide by fish liver enzymes part A: identification and synthesis of TFM metabolites

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Metabolism of a sea lamprey pesticide by fish liver enzymes part A: identification and synthesis of TFM metabolites
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0830-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ugo Bussy, Yu-Wen Chung-Davidson, Tyler Buchinger, Ke Li, Scott A. Smith, A. Daniel Jones, Weiming Li

Abstract

The sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is a destructive invasive species in the Great Lakes that contributed to the collapse of native fish populations in the mid-1900s. 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-nitrophenol (TFM) is a selective pesticide that has been applied to sea lamprey infested tributaries of the Great Lakes to kill larvae since the 1960s and has reduced the populations by as much as 90%. However, the metabolism of TFM by sea lamprey and non-target species is not fully illuminated. Elucidation of TFM metabolism is critical for understanding its mode of action and possible environmental impact. Here, we describe the screening, identification, synthesis and structural characterization of TFM metabolites in livers from sea lamprey and three non-target species that differ in their ability to survive TFM exposure. We identified glucuronidation, sulfation, N-acetylation, glutathione conjugation, and aromatic nitro group reduction as potential detoxification mechanisms. Seven metabolites were synthesized for use as markers of TFM metabolism in fish. Quantitative 1H NMR was used to assay synthesized metabolite stock solutions that were then used as standard material to develop a quantitative LC-MS/MS method for TFM metabolites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Chemistry 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,602
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,778
of 448,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#104
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.