↓ Skip to main content

Effect of l-carnitine supplementation on the body carnitine pool, skeletal muscle energy metabolism and physical performance in male vegetarians

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Effect of l-carnitine supplementation on the body carnitine pool, skeletal muscle energy metabolism and physical performance in male vegetarians
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00394-015-0838-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katerina Novakova, Oliver Kummer, Jamal Bouitbir, Sonja D. Stoffel, Ulrike Hoerler-Koerner, Michael Bodmer, Paul Roberts, Albert Urwyler, Rolf Ehrsam, Stephan Krähenbühl

Abstract

More than 95 % of the body carnitine is located in skeletal muscle, where it is essential for energy metabolism. Vegetarians ingest less carnitine and carnitine precursors and have lower plasma carnitine concentrations than omnivores. Principle aims of the current study were to assess the plasma and skeletal muscle carnitine content and physical performance of male vegetarians and matched omnivores under basal conditions and after L-carnitine supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 20%
Student > Master 27 18%
Other 9 6%
Researcher 6 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 55 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 59 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,751,291
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#683
of 2,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,062
of 361,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#16
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.