| Title |
Radiography for low back pain: a randomised controlled trial and observational study in primary care.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2002
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sally Kerry, Sean Hilton, Derek Dundas, Elizabeth Rink, Pippa Oakeshott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 83% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,766,504
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,633
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,118
of 126,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.