| Title |
Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Services within Indices of Multiple Deprivation: Implications of Applying an Enhanced two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12061-017-9246-2 |
| Authors |
Nicholas Page, Mitchel Langford, Gary Higgs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,530,679
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
#15
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,209
of 449,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.