↓ Skip to main content

Estimates of the Modeling Error of the α-Models of Turbulence in Two and Three Space Dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 359)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Estimates of the Modeling Error of the α-Models of Turbulence in Two and Three Space Dimensions
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00021-017-0357-y
Authors

Argus A. Dunca

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#12,943,426
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#11
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,705
of 441,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.