↓ Skip to main content

Oral health in geroscience: animal models and the aging oral cavity

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Oral health in geroscience: animal models and the aging oral cavity
Published in
GeroScience, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11357-017-0004-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Y. An, Richard Darveau, Matt Kaeberlein

Abstract

Age is the single greatest risk factor for many diseases, including oral diseases. Despite this, a majority of preclinical oral health research has not adequately considered the importance of aging in research aimed at the mechanistic understanding of oral disease. Here, we have attempted to provide insights from animal studies in the geroscience field and apply them in the context of oral health research. In particular, we discuss the relationship between the biology of aging and mechanisms of oral disease. We also present a framework for defining and utilizing age-appropriate rodents and present experimental design considerations, such as the number of age-points used and the importance of genetic background. While focused primarily on rodent models, alternative animal models that may be particularly useful for studies of oral health during aging, such as companion dogs and marmoset monkeys, are also discussed. We hope that such information will aid in the design of future preclinical studies of geriatric dental health, thus allowing more reliability for translation of such studies to age-associated oral disease in people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,027,651
of 23,764,938 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#339
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,457
of 445,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,764,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them