↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the impact of natural enemies in agroecosystems: toward “real” IPM or in quest of the Holy Grail?

Overview of attention for article published in Insect Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the impact of natural enemies in agroecosystems: toward “real” IPM or in quest of the Holy Grail?
Published in
Insect Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/1744-7917.12172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myron P. Zalucki, Michael J. Furlong, Nancy A. Schellhorn, Sarina Macfadyen, Andrew P. Davies

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 62%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,678,730
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Insect Science
#108
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,186
of 266,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insect Science
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.