↓ Skip to main content

Drug use in pregnant women—a pilot study of the coherence between reported use of drugs and presence of drugs in plasma

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Drug use in pregnant women—a pilot study of the coherence between reported use of drugs and presence of drugs in plasma
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2402-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emelie Wolgast, Ann Josefsson, Martin Josefsson, Caroline Lilliecreutz, Margareta Reis

Abstract

In Sweden, information on drug use during pregnancy is obtained through an interview and recorded in a standardized medical record at every visit to the antenatal care clinic throughout the pregnancy. Antenatal, delivery, and neonatal records constitute the basis for the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR). The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate the reliability of reported drug use by simultaneous screening for drug substances in the blood stream of the pregnant woman and thereby validate self-reported data in the MBR. Plasma samples from 200 women were obtained at gestational weeks 10-12 and 25 and screened for drugs by using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with time of flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-TOF-MS). The results from the analysis were then compared to medical records. At the first sampling occasion, the drugs found by screening had been reported by 86% of the women and on the second sampling, 85.5%. Missed reported information was clearly associated with drugs for occasional use. The most common drugs in plasma taken in early and mid-pregnancy were meclizine and paracetamol. Two types of continuously used drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and propranolol, were used. All women using them reported it and the drug screening revealed a 100% coherence. This study shows good coherence between reported drug intake and the drugs found in plasma samples, which in turn positively validates the MBR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,925,346
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2,181
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,722
of 440,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.