↓ Skip to main content

The breakup of intravascular microbubbles and its impact on the endothelium

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
The breakup of intravascular microbubbles and its impact on the endothelium
Published in
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10237-016-0840-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Wiedemair, Zeljko Tukovic, Hrvoje Jasak, Dimos Poulikakos, Vartan Kurtcuoglu

Abstract

Encapsulated microbubbles (MBs) serve as endovascular agents in a wide range of medical ultrasound applications. The oscillatory response of these agents to ultrasonic excitation is determined by MB size, gas content, viscoelastic shell properties and geometrical constraints. The viscoelastic parameters of the MB capsule vary during an oscillation cycle and change irreversibly upon shell rupture. The latter results in marked stress changes on the endothelium of capillary blood vessels due to altered MB dynamics. Mechanical effects on microvessels are crucial for safety and efficacy in applications such as focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening. Since direct in vivo quantification of vascular stresses is currently not achievable, computational modelling has established itself as an alternative. We have developed a novel computational framework combining fluid-structure coupling and interface tracking to model the nonlinear dynamics of an encapsulated MB in constrained environments. This framework is used to investigate the mechanical stresses at the endothelium resulting from MB shell rupture in three microvessel setups of increasing levels of geometric detail. All configurations predict substantial elevation of up to 150 % for peak wall shear stress upon MB breakup, whereas global peak transmural pressure levels remain unaltered. The presence of red blood cells causes confinement of pressure and shear gradients to the proximity of the MB, and the introduction of endothelial texture creates local modulations of shear stress levels. With regard to safety assessments, the mechanical impact of MB breakup is shown to be more important than taking into account individual red blood cells and endothelial texture. The latter two may prove to be relevant to the actual, complex process of BBB opening induced by MB oscillations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#285
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,934
of 322,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.