↓ Skip to main content

The IMPACT Q framework: teaching medical students how to gather a psychosocial history

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The IMPACT Q framework: teaching medical students how to gather a psychosocial history
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x694349
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shivani Tanna, Noreen Ryan, Sonia Kumar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Psychology 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,160,940
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,040
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,778
of 455,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#22
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.