| Title |
Refining the ethics of computer-made decisions: a classification of moral mediation by ubiquitous machines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethics and Information Technology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-015-9360-2 |
| Authors |
Marlies Van de Voort, Wolter Pieters, Luca Consoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 24 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,424,793
of 24,241,559 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#152
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,468
of 359,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,241,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.