| Title |
Membrane sweeping added to formal induction method to increase the spontaneous vaginal delivery: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-017-4643-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Liu, Guang Song, Tao Meng, Ge Zhao |
| Abstract |
Membrane sweeping (MS) could increase the likelihood of spontaneous labor within 48 h. However, the rationale for performing routinely an intervention with the potential to induce labor in women with an uneventful pregnancy at 38 weeks of gestation is, at least, questionable. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to assess evaluated the effect of MS added to formal induction method on the spontaneous vaginal delivery, compared with formal induction alone. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials were searched from their inception to March 8, 2017. We estimate summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery, and second outcomes (side effects of MS) included meconium-stained liquor, admission to the neonatal unit, instrumental delivery. Four RCTs with a total of 1377 participants were identified. The summary RR in the overall group was 1.12 (95% CI 1.05-1.18), with moderate heterogeneity (P = 0.22, I2 = 33%). The summary RR in the nulliparas' subgroup was 1.32 (95% CI 1.18-1.48), with no heterogeneity (P = 0.79, I2 = 0%). MS did not increase the risk of side effects. MS added to formal induction significantly increased vaginal delivery rates, especially in nulliparas compared with formal induction alone. Notably, there are no obvious side effects of MS. Meanwhile, more RCTs studies are needed to investigate the side effects of MS on instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and cervical laceration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 20% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,772,000
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#493
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,565
of 453,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.