↓ Skip to main content

Beyond teaching instructional design models: exploring the design process to advance professional development and expertise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computing in Higher Education, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 255)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Beyond teaching instructional design models: exploring the design process to advance professional development and expertise
Published in
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12528-017-9164-y
Authors

Abbie H. Brown, Timothy D. Green

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Lecturer 8 10%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 14%
Arts and Humanities 9 11%
Engineering 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 34 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,003,945
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
#14
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,751
of 441,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.