↓ Skip to main content

Microscopic Colitis: Clinical and Pathologic Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microscopic Colitis: Clinical and Pathologic Perspectives
Published in
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.12.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Münch, Cord Langner

Abstract

Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic nonbloody diarrhea and specific histopathology features. Active disease, defined as 3 or more stools or 1 or more watery stools per day, significantly reduces quality of life. Epidemiologic studies have found the incidence and prevalence of microscopic colitis to be comparable with those of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Nevertheless, microscopic colitis is still under-recognized in clinical practice-most health care workers know little about its etiology and pathophysiology. Furthermore, there are many challenges to the diagnosis and treatment of patients. We review the epidemiologic and clinical features of this disorder and discuss its pathogenesis. We also outline the criteria for histopathologic evaluation of microscopic colitis, recently published by the European Consensus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and discuss a treatment algorithm created by the European Microscopic Colitis Group. Treatment options for patients with budesonide-refractory disease are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Other 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 58%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,183,857
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#1,679
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,007
of 318,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.