↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Utility of Frailty Assessment for Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
62 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Utility of Frailty Assessment for Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maciej Kubala, Laurence Guédon-Moreau, Frédéric Anselme, Didier Klug, Geneviève Bertaina, Sarah Traullé, Otilia Buiciuc, Arnaud Savouré, Momar Diouf, Jean-Sylvain Hermida

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of frailty in the elderly on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). CRT has been shown to improve symptoms and outcome of patients with congestive heart failure (HF) and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The impact of frailty on the results of CRT is unknown. Frailty defined as <14 of 17 points using the ONCODAGE (Outil de dépistage gériatrique en oncologie) G8 score was assessed before device implantation in candidates for CRT who were >70 years of age. The primary endpoint was the response to CRT, defined as an improvement of >5% of the LVEF and the absence of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death at 9 months. Ninety-two of 151 included patients (61%) were frail, and 89 (59%) were responders. Frailty was more frequent in nonresponders: 45 of 62 (73%) versus 47 of 89 (53%) (p = 0.014) and was identified as an independent predictor of nonresponse to CRT (R = 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.59; p = 0.039). Frailty was associated with a higher cumulative probability of hospitalization for HF (log-rank p = 0.032) and of all-cause death (log-rank p = 0.033). A G8 score <10.25 correlated with hospitalization for HF or death at 9 months (area under the curve: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.63 to 0.87; cutoff <10.25; 77% sensitivity, 63% specificity). Frailty is as an independent predictor of nonresponse to CRT. Frail patients implanted with CRT devices have a higher risk of hospitalization for HF and mortality. Routine comprehensive geriatric assessment at the time of screening for device therapy should be recommended to optimize management. (Frailty Score Assessment for Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [FRAILTY]; NCT02369419).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 21 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,201,179
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#224
of 1,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,926
of 323,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.