↓ Skip to main content

Intentional versus unintentional nitrogen use in the United States: trends, efficiency and implications

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Intentional versus unintentional nitrogen use in the United States: trends, efficiency and implications
Published in
Biogeochemistry, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10533-012-9801-5
Authors

Benjamin Z. Houlton, Elizabeth Boyer, Adrien Finzi, James Galloway, Allison Leach, Daniel Liptzin, Jerry Melillo, Todd S. Rosenstock, Dan Sobota, Alan R. Townsend

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Kenya 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 65 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 6%
Engineering 5 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 32 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,488,131
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#176
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,077
of 180,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.