↓ Skip to main content

When Behavioral Health Concerns Present in Pediatric Primary Care: Factors Influencing Provider Decision-Making

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
When Behavioral Health Concerns Present in Pediatric Primary Care: Factors Influencing Provider Decision-Making
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11414-017-9580-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H Connors, Prerna Arora, Angela M. Blizzard, Kelly Bower, Kelly Coble, Joyce Harrison, David Pruitt, Janna Steinberg, Lawrence Wissow

Abstract

Primary care providers (PCPs) frequently encounter behavioral health (BH) needs among their pediatric patients. However, PCPs report variable training in and comfort with BH, and questions remain about how and when PCPs address pediatric BH needs. Existing literature on PCP decisions to address pediatric BH in-office versus referring to subspecialty BH is limited and findings are mixed. Accordingly, this study sought to examine parameters and contextual factors influencing PCP decisions and practices related to BH care. Qualitative interview results with 21 PCPs in Maryland indicated that decisions about how and when to address pediatric BH concerns are influenced by the type BH service needed, patient characteristics, the availability of BH services in the community, and possibly PCPs' perceptions of BH care as a distinct subspecialty. Findings suggest that efforts to support individual PCPs' capacity to address BH within primary care must be balanced by efforts to expand the subspecialty BH workforce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Psychology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#439
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,540
of 446,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.