↓ Skip to main content

First genomic insights into members of a candidate bacterial phylum responsible for wastewater bulking

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First genomic insights into members of a candidate bacterial phylum responsible for wastewater bulking
Published in
PeerJ, January 2015
DOI 10.7717/peerj.740
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Sekiguchi, Akiko Ohashi, Donovan H. Parks, Toshihiro Yamauchi, Gene W. Tyson, Philip Hugenholtz

Abstract

Filamentous cells belonging to the candidate bacterial phylum KSB3 were previously identified as the causative agent of fatal filament overgrowth (bulking) in a high-rate industrial anaerobic wastewater treatment bioreactor. Here, we obtained near complete genomes from two KSB3 populations in the bioreactor, including the dominant bulking filament, using differential coverage binning of metagenomic data. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with 16S rRNA-targeted probes specific for the two populations confirmed that both are filamentous organisms. Genome-based metabolic reconstruction and microscopic observation of the KSB3 filaments in the presence of sugar gradients indicate that both filament types are Gram-negative, strictly anaerobic fermenters capable of non-flagellar based gliding motility, and have a strikingly large number of sensory and response regulator genes. We propose that the KSB3 filaments are highly sensitive to their surroundings and that cellular processes, including those causing bulking, are controlled by external stimuli. The obtained genomes lay the foundation for a more detailed understanding of environmental cues used by KSB3 filaments, which may lead to more robust treatment options to prevent bulking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 29%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Environmental Science 11 11%
Engineering 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,075,266
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#2,293
of 13,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,819
of 356,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#30
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.