You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcriptional programs define molecular characteristics of innate lymphoid cell classes and subsets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Immunology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ni.3094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle L Robinette, Anja Fuchs, Victor S Cortez, Jacob S Lee, Yaming Wang, Scott K Durum, Susan Gilfillan, Marco Colonna |
| Abstract |
The recognized diversity of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) is rapidly expanding. Three ILC classes have emerged, ILC1, ILC2 and ILC3, with ILC1 and ILC3 including several subsets. The classification of some subsets is unclear, and it remains controversial whether natural killer (NK) cells and ILC1 cells are distinct cell types. To address these issues, we analyzed gene expression in ILCs and NK cells from mouse small intestine, spleen and liver, as part of the Immunological Genome Project. The results showed unique gene-expression patterns for some ILCs and overlapping patterns for ILC1 cells and NK cells, whereas other ILC subsets remained indistinguishable. We identified a transcriptional program shared by small intestine ILCs and a core ILC signature. We revealed and discuss transcripts that suggest previously unknown functions and developmental paths for ILCs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 557 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 25% |
| Researcher | 113 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 12% |
| Unknown | 106 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 154 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 154 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Unknown | 110 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,774,297
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#1,067
of 4,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,126
of 360,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.