↓ Skip to main content

Development of a sensitive PCR-dot blot assay to supplement serological tests for diagnosing Lyme disease

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 2,989)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Development of a sensitive PCR-dot blot assay to supplement serological tests for diagnosing Lyme disease
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10096-017-3162-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. S. Shah, I. D’ Cruz, S. Ward, N. S. Harris, R. Ramasamy

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease is difficult and presently dependent on detecting Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibodies in patient serum with the disadvantage that the immune response to B. burgdorferi can be weak or variable, or alternatively, the slow and inefficient culture confirmation of B. burgdorferi. PCR tests have previously shown poor sensitivity and are not routinely used for diagnosis. We developed a sensitive and specific Lyme Multiplex PCR-dot blot assay (LM-PCR assay) applicable to blood and urine samples to supplement western blot (WB) serological tests for detecting B. burgdorferi infection. The LM-PCR assay utilizes specific DNA hybridization to purify B. burgdorferi DNA followed by PCR amplification of flagellin and OspA gene fragments and their detection by southern dot blots. Results of the assay on 107 and 402 clinical samples from patients with suspected Lyme disease from Houston, Texas or received at the IGeneX laboratory in Palo Alto, California, respectively, were analyzed together with WB findings. The LM-PCR assay was highly specific for B. burgdorferi. In the Texas samples, 23 (21.5%) patients antibody-negative in WB assays by current US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended criteria were positive by LM-PCR performed on urine, serum or whole blood samples. With IGeneX samples, of the 402 LM-PCR positive blood samples, only 70 met the CDC criteria for positive WBs, while 236 met IGeneX criteria for positive WB. Use of the LM-PCR assay and optimization of current CDC serological criteria can improve the diagnosis of Lyme disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,115,093
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#45
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,572
of 455,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.