↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Changes of Synaptic and Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptor Expression in Rat Cerebellar Neurons In Vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Developmental Changes of Synaptic and Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptor Expression in Rat Cerebellar Neurons In Vitro
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12031-017-1021-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitry A. Sibarov, Yulia D. Stepanenko, Ivan V. Silantiev, Polina A. Abushik, Tatiana V. Karelina, Sergei M. Antonov

Abstract

Transient expression of different NMDA receptors (NMDARs) plays a role in development of the cerebellum. Whether similar processes undergo during neuronal differentiation in culture is not clearly understood. We studied NMDARs in cerebellar neurons in cultures of 7 and 21 days in vitro (DIV) using immunocytochemical and electrophysiological approaches. Whereas at 7 DIV, the vast majority of neurons were immunopositive for GluN2 subunits, further synaptoginesis was accompanied by the time-dependent loss of NMDARs. In contrast to GluN2B- and GluN2C-containing NMDARs, which at 7 DIV exhibited homogenous distribution in extrasynaptic regions, GluN2A-containing receptors were aggregated in spots both in cell bodies and dendrites. Double staining for GluN2A subunits and synaptophysin, a widely used marker for presynaptic terminals, revealed their co-localization in about 75% of dendrite GluN2A fluorescent spots, suggesting postsynaptic origin of GluN2A subunits. In agreement, diheteromeric GluN2A-containing NMDARs contributed to postsynaptic currents recorded in neurons throughout the timescale under study. Diheteromeric GluN2B-containing NMDARs escaped postsynaptic regions during differentiation. Finally, the developmental switch favored the expression of triheteromeric NMDARs assembled of 2 GluN1/1 GluN2B/1 GluN2C or GluN2D subunits in extrasynaptic regions. At 21 DIV, these receptors represented over 60% of the NMDAR population. Thus, cerebellar neurons in primary culture undergo transformations with respect to the expression of di- and triheteromeric NMDARs that should be taken into account when studying cellular aspects of their pharmacology and functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#1,330
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388,599
of 448,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.