↓ Skip to main content

Observations on Vertical Variability in Groundwater Quality: Implications for Aquifer Management

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Management, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Observations on Vertical Variability in Groundwater Quality: Implications for Aquifer Management
Published in
Water Resources Management, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11269-010-9746-1
Authors

Lior Netzer, Noam Weisbrod, Daniel Kurtzman, Ahmed Nasser, Ellen R. Graber, Daniel Ronen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Student > Master 4 21%
Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 42%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,543,662
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Management
#139
of 618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,547
of 181,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Management
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them