| Title |
Plant regeneration from leaf explants of mature sandalwood (Santalum album L.) trees under in vitro conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11627-013-9495-y |
| Authors |
C. K. Singh, Sandeep R. Raj, V. R. Patil, P. S. Jaiswal, N. Subhash |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant
#348
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,050
of 196,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.