↓ Skip to main content

No Evidence for Association of Autism with Rare Heterozygous Point Mutations in Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 2 (CNTNAP2), or in Other Contactin-Associated Proteins or Contactins

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No Evidence for Association of Autism with Rare Heterozygous Point Mutations in Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 2 (CNTNAP2), or in Other Contactin-Associated Proteins or Contactins
Published in
PLoS Genetics, January 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004852
Pubmed ID
Authors

John D. Murdoch, Abha R. Gupta, Stephan J. Sanders, Michael F. Walker, John Keaney, Thomas V. Fernandez, Michael T. Murtha, Samuel Anyanwu, Gordon T. Ober, Melanie J. Raubeson, Nicholas M. DiLullo, Natalie Villa, Zainabdul Waqar, Catherine Sullivan, Luis Gonzalez, A. Jeremy Willsey, So-Yeon Choe, Benjamin M. Neale, Mark J. Daly, Matthew W. State

Abstract

Contactins and Contactin-Associated Proteins, and Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 2 (CNTNAP2) in particular, have been widely cited as autism risk genes based on findings from homozygosity mapping, molecular cytogenetics, copy number variation analyses, and both common and rare single nucleotide association studies. However, data specifically with regard to the contribution of heterozygous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) have been inconsistent. In an effort to clarify the role of rare point mutations in CNTNAP2 and related gene families, we have conducted targeted next-generation sequencing and evaluated existing sequence data in cohorts totaling 2704 cases and 2747 controls. We find no evidence for statistically significant association of rare heterozygous mutations in any of the CNTN or CNTNAP genes, including CNTNAP2, placing marked limits on the scale of their plausible contribution to risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 25%
Neuroscience 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Psychology 8 8%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,754,604
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#2,302
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,666
of 360,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#31
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.