↓ Skip to main content

Phagocytosis of Microglia in the Central Nervous System Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
483 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
714 Mendeley
Title
Phagocytosis of Microglia in the Central Nervous System Diseases
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12035-013-8620-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruying Fu, Qingyu Shen, Pengfei Xu, Jin Jun Luo, Yamei Tang

Abstract

Microglia, the resident macrophages of the central nervous system, rapidly activate in nearly all kinds of neurological diseases. These activated microglia become highly motile, secreting inflammatory cytokines, migrating to the lesion area, and phagocytosing cell debris or damaged neurons. During the past decades, the secretory property and chemotaxis of microglia have been well-studied, while relatively less attention has been paid to microglial phagocytosis. So far there is no obvious concordance with whether it is beneficial or detrimental in tissue repair. This review focuses on phagocytic phenotype of microglia in neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, ischemic and other brain diseases. Microglial morphological characteristics, involved receptors and signaling pathways, distribution variation along with time and space changes, and environmental factors that affecting phagocytic function in each disease are reviewed. Moreover, a comparison of contributions between macrophages from peripheral circulation and the resident microglia to these pathogenic processes will also be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 714 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 704 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 179 25%
Student > Bachelor 104 15%
Student > Master 98 14%
Researcher 81 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 5%
Other 65 9%
Unknown 153 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 153 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 103 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 4%
Other 81 11%
Unknown 175 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,344,052
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,222
of 3,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,735
of 305,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.