↓ Skip to main content

Genomic characterization and pathogenic study of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses with different virulence in Fujian, China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic characterization and pathogenic study of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses with different virulence in Fujian, China
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Science, May 2018
DOI 10.4142/jvs.2018.19.3.339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiukun Sui, Ting Xin, Xiaoyu Guo, Hong Jia, Ming Li, Xintao Gao, Jing Wu, Yitong Jiang, L. Willems, Hongfei Zhu, Shaohua Hou

Abstract

Two strains of PRRSVs were isolated in 2006 and 2016, respectively, and designated as FZ06A and FZ16A. Through the inoculation experiments, it was shown that FZ06A caused 100% morbidity and 60% mortality, while FZ16A caused 100% morbidity without death. By using genomic sequence and phylogenetic analyses, close relation of Chinese highly pathogenic PRRSV strain with FZ06A and FZ16A strains was achieved. Based on the achieved results, multiple genomic variations in Nsp2, a unique N-glycosylation site (N³³→K³³), and a K151 AA substitution for virulence in the GP5 of FZ16A were detected except of 30 amino acids (AA) deletion in the NSP2-coding region. Likewise, inoculation experiments were conducted and weaker virulence of the FZ16A compared to FZ06A strain was obtained. According to the presented data in this article, 30 AA deletion in the NSP2-coding region is not a reliable genomic indicator for the high virulence of PRRSV strains, The difference of Nsp2 and GP5 and the virulence between these two highly pathogenic PRRSV (HP-PRRSV) strains has potential to establish the basis for further studies of virulence determinants for PRRSVs and also to create useful data for development of vaccines against this economically devastating disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Science
#316
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,499
of 344,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Science
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.