↓ Skip to main content

An international survey of patients with cervical dystonia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
An international survey of patients with cervical dystonia
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-014-7586-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia Comella, Kailash Bhatia

Abstract

This was an international survey undertaken to assess cervical dystonia (CD) patients own perceptions of their illness and its management. A total of 1,071 self-identified respondents with CD in 38 countries completed the online survey between March and December 2012. The mean time since diagnosis was 9.6 years and over half (54 %) of patients surveyed were not diagnosed in the first year. When asked how the symptoms of CD affected them, two-thirds (66 %) of patients reported they experienced a lot of pain, and 61 % said that they suffered depression and mood alterations; only 7 % reported no impact on their lives. Despite problems with the diagnosis, almost 70 % of respondents reported being satisfied with the overall relationship with their doctor. Patient treatment expectations were high, with 63 % expecting freedom from spasms and 62 % expecting freedom from pain. Over half (53 %) expected to be able to return to a normal routine (53 %). The most common treatment reported was botulinum toxin (BoNT) (86 %), followed by oral medication (58 %) and physiotherapy/physical therapy (37 %). Among patients treated on BoNT, 56 % were fairly/very satisfied, 25 % were fairly/very dissatisfied and 20 % were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the outcome. In conclusion, this international survey highlights the broad impact of CD on several aspects of patient life. Taken overall, the survey suggests that that patients need to be better informed about their condition, treatments available and the limitations of those treatments. It may be that realistically managing patient expectations of treatment would reduce the dissatisfaction of some patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 9 7%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 46 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,329,245
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,036
of 4,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,956
of 359,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.