↓ Skip to main content

Do holly leaf spines really deter herbivory?

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Do holly leaf spines really deter herbivory?
Published in
Oecologia, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00378601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel A. Potter, Thomas W. Kimmerer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 47%
Environmental Science 13 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#4,006
of 4,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,816
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.