↓ Skip to main content

miR-23a suppresses proliferation of osteosarcoma cells by targeting SATB1

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
miR-23a suppresses proliferation of osteosarcoma cells by targeting SATB1
Published in
Tumor Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3120-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangbin Wang, Bin Li, Yonghui Fu, Ming He, Jiashi Wang, Peng Shen, Lunhao Bai

Abstract

Accumulating evidence has shown that microRNAs are involved in multiple processes in cancer development and progression. Recent studies have shown that miR-23a functions as an oncogene in various human cancer types, but its role in osteosarcoma remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrated that miR-23a is frequently downregulated in osteosarcoma specimens and cell lines compared with adjacent noncancerous tissues and cell line. Bioinformatics analysis further revealed SATB1 as a potential target of miR-23a. Data from luciferase reporter assays showed that miR-23a directly binds to the 3'UTR of SATB1 messenger RNA (mRNA). Furthermore, we found that expression patterns of miR-23a were inversely correlated with those of SATB1 in osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines, and overexpression of miR-23a suppressed SATB1 expression at both transcriptional and translational levels in osteosarcoma cell lines. In functional assays, miR-23a inhibited osteosarcoma cell proliferation, which could be reversed by overexpression of SATB1. Furthermore, knockdown of SATB1 reduced osteosarcoma cell proliferation, which resembled the inhibitory effects of miR-23a overexpression. Taken together, our data provide compelling evidence that miR-23a functions as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma, and its inhibitory effect on tumor are mediated chiefly through downregulation of SATB1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 31%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,251,039
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,694
of 352,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#106
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.