↓ Skip to main content

Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 3,823)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015
Published in
Osteoporosis International, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Michael Lewiecki, N. C. Wright, J. R. Curtis, E. Siris, R. F. Gagel, K. G. Saag, A. J. Singer, P. M. Steven, R. A. Adler

Abstract

An analysis of United States (US) Medicare claims data from 2002 to 2015 for women aged ≥ 65 years found that age-adjusted hip fracture rates for 2013, 2014, and 2015 were higher than projected, resulting in an estimated increase of more than 11,000 hip fractures. Hip fractures are a major public health concern due to high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenses. Previous studies have reported a decrease in the annual incidence of hip fractures in the US beginning in 1995, coincident with the introduction of modern diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents for osteoporosis. In recent years, there has been less bone density testing and fewer prescriptions for osteoporosis treatments. The large osteoporosis treatment gap raises concern of possible adverse effects on hip fracture rates. We assessed hip fracture incidence in the US to determine if the previous decline in hip fracture incidence continued. Using 2002 to 2015 Medicare Part A and Part B claims for women ≥ 65 years old, we calculated age-adjusted hip fracture rates, weighting to the 2014 population. We found that hip fracture rates declined each year from 2002 to 2012 and then plateaued at levels higher than projected for years 2013, 2014, and 2015. The plateau in age-adjusted hip fracture incidence rate resulted in more than 11,000 additional estimated hip fractures over the time periods 2013, 2014, and 2015. We recommend further study to assess all factors contributing to this remarkable change in hip fracture rate and to develop strategies to reduce the osteoporosis treatment gap.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 14%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#260,292
of 24,916,485 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#26
of 3,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,022
of 453,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,916,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.