↓ Skip to main content

Theory-based approach for maintaining resistance training in older adults with prediabetes: adherence, barriers, self-regulation strategies, treatment fidelity, costs

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Behavioral Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Theory-based approach for maintaining resistance training in older adults with prediabetes: adherence, barriers, self-regulation strategies, treatment fidelity, costs
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13142-015-0304-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard A. Winett, Brenda M. Davy, Jyoti Savla, Elaina L. Marinik, Sarah A. Kelleher, Sheila G. Winett, Tanya M. Halliday, David M. Williams

Abstract

Effectively preventing and treating chronic diseases through health behavior changes often require intensive theory- and evidence-based intervention including long-term maintenance components. We assessed the efficacy of theory-based maintenance approaches varying by dose for persistently performing resistance training (RT) with the hypothesis that a higher-dose social cognitive theory (SCT) approach would produce greater RT adherence than lower-dose Standard. The Resist-Diabetes study first established 2×/week resistance training (RT) in a 3-month supervised intervention in older (50-69 years, N = 170), overweight to obese (BMI 25-39.9 kg/m(2)) previously inactive adults who fit prediabetes criteria (fasting glucose concentration = 95-125 mg/dl; oral glucose tolerance test 2-h glucose concentration = 140-199 mg/dl or both). After the supervised phase, participants (N = 159) were then randomly assigned to one of two conditions for transition (3 weeks) and then RT alone in community settings for extended contact, maintenance (6 months), and then no contact (6 months). SCT featured continued tailored, interactive personal, and web-based check-ups focused on RT, self-regulation, and a barrier/strategies approach. Standard involved low-dose, generic personal, and web-based check-ups within the same theoretical approach. SCT and Standard both resulted in similar RT, 2×/week adherence during maintenance (74.4 %) and no-contact phases (53.1 %). Cost analysis indicated the Standard intervention for transition and maintenance was inexpensive ($160). Standard can be translated into practice with the potential for continuous contact and persistence in RT beyond the typical program maintenance phase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Psychology 20 13%
Sports and Recreations 18 12%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,655,338
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#240
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,349
of 352,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.