You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of pelvic floor muscle function.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.2519/jospt.2007.2548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jackie L Whittaker, Judith A Thompson, Deydre S Teyhen, Paul Hodges |
| Abstract |
This commentary provides an overview of the current concepts and evidence related to rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of pelvic floor (levator ani) function. As this is an emerging topic, the goal is to provide a basic understanding of ultrasound imaging applications related to levator ani function: the available quantitative and qualitative information, the limitations, as well as how ultrasound imaging can be incorporated as a form of biofeedback during rehabilitation. Furthermore, as the ability to compile and compare existing evidence depends on the degree of similarity in methodology by investigators, this commentary highlights points of consideration and provides guidelines, as well as an agenda, for future investigation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 24% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,602,949
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1,717
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,734
of 76,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.