You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nationwide Cohort Study of Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Celiac Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.110.965624 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Stefan James, Johan Askling, Ulf Stenestrand, Erik Ingelsson |
Abstract |
Studies on ischemic heart disease (IHD) incidence in individuals with celiac disease (CD) are contradictory and do not take small intestinal pathology into account. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kuwait | 2 | 18% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 64% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,754,388
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#6,727
of 21,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,395
of 193,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#37
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.