| Title |
Assessing infrequent large earthquakes using geomorphology and geodesy: the Malawi Rift
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-014-1572-y |
| Authors |
Michael Hodge, Juliet Biggs, Katsuichiro Goda, Willy Aspinall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 60% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,823,439
of 24,008,549 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,308
of 1,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,985
of 359,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#20
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,008,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.