↓ Skip to main content

A breath of information: the volatilome

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,203)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
A breath of information: the volatilome
Published in
Current Genetics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00294-017-0800-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Mansurova, Birgitta E. Ebert, Lars M. Blank, Alfredo J. Ibáñez

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are small molecular mass substances, which exhibit low boiling points and high-vapour pressures. They are ubiquitous in nature and produced by almost any organism of all kingdoms of life. VOCs are involved in many inter- and intraspecies interactions ranging from antimicrobial or fungal effects to plant growth promotion and human taste perception of fermentation products. VOC profiles further reflect the metabolic or phenotypic state of the living organism that produces them. Hence, they can be exploited for non-invasive medicinal diagnoses or industrial fermentation control. Here, we introduce the reader to these diverse applications associated with the monitoring and analysis of VOC emissions. We also present our vision of real-time VOC analysis enabled by newly developed analytical techniques, which will further broaden the use of VOCs in even wider applications. Hence, we foresee a bright future for VOC research and its associated fields of applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 36 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Chemistry 15 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 42 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,908,615
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#26
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,780
of 441,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.