↓ Skip to main content

The Screening and Diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
29 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
777 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
Title
The Screening and Diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1021943802493
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline A. Filipek, Pasquale J. Accardo, Grace T. Baranek, Edwin H. Cook, Geraldine Dawson, Barry Gordon, Judith S. Gravel, Chris P. Johnson, Ronald J. Kallen, Susan E. Levy, Nancy J. Minshew, Barry M. Prizant, Isabelle Rapin, Sally J. Rogers, Wendy L. Stone, Stuart Teplin, Roberto F. Tuchman, Fred R. Volkmar

Abstract

The Child Neurology Society and American Academy of Neurology recently proposed to formulate Practice Parameters for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Autism for their memberships. This endeavor was expanded to include representatives from nine professional organizations and four parent organizations, with liaisons from the National Institutes of Health. This document was written by this multidisciplinary Consensus Panel after systematic analysis of over 2,500 relevant scientific articles in the literature. The Panel concluded that appropriate diagnosis of autism requires a dual-level approach: (a) routine developmental surveillance, and (b) diagnosis and evaluation of autism. Specific detailed recommendations for each level have been established in this document, which are intended to improve the rate of early suspicion and diagnosis of, and therefore early intervention for, autism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 447 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 6%
Student > Master 21 5%
Student > Bachelor 20 4%
Researcher 13 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 2%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 328 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 331 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,586
of 5,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,152
of 107,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them