↓ Skip to main content

Is approval voting an ‘unmitigated evil’?: A response to Brams, Fishburn, and Merrill

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, November 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Is approval voting an ‘unmitigated evil’?: A response to Brams, Fishburn, and Merrill
Published in
Public Choice, November 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00054449
Authors

Donald G. Saari, Jill Van Newenhizen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Professor 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 17%
Mathematics 2 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#517
of 1,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,881
of 14,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.