You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Capacity for thermal acclimation differs between populations and phylogenetic lineages within a species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Functional Ecology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02052.x |
| Authors |
Frank Seebacher, Sebastian Holmes, Nicholas J. Roosen, Morgane Nouvian, Robbie S. Wilson, Ashley J. W. Ward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,718,114
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#2,144
of 2,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,846
of 176,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.