| Title |
Systematics and biology of silica bodies in monocotyledons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1663/0006-8101(2004)069[0377:sabosb]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Christina J. Prychid, Paula J. Rudall, Mary Gregory |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 18% |
| Researcher | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,445,969
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#38
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,072
of 56,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them