↓ Skip to main content

HBLAST: Parallelised sequence similarity – A Hadoop MapReducable basic local alignment search tool

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Informatics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HBLAST: Parallelised sequence similarity – A Hadoop MapReducable basic local alignment search tool
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisling O’Driscoll, Vladislav Belogrudov, John Carroll, Kai Kropp, Paul Walsh, Peter Ghazal, Roy D. Sleator

Abstract

The recent exponential growth of genomic databases has resulted in the common task of sequence alignment becoming one of the major bottlenecks in the field of computational biology. It is typical for these large datasets and complex computations to require cost prohibitive High Performance Computing (HPC) to function. As such, parallelised solutions have been proposed but many exhibit scalability limitations and are incapable of effectively processing "Big Data" - the name attributed to datasets that are extremely large, complex and require rapid processing. The Hadoop framework, comprised of distributed storage and a parallelised programming framework known as MapReduce, is specifically designed to work with such datasets but it is not trivial to efficiently redesign and implement bioinformatics algorithms according to this paradigm. The parallelisation strategy of "divide and conquer" for alignment algorithms can be applied to both data sets and input query sequences. However, scalability is still an issue due to memory constraints or large databases, with very large database segmentation leading to additional performance decline. Herein, we present Hadoop Blast (HBlast), a parallelised BLAST algorithm that proposes a flexible method to partition both databases and input query sequences using "virtual partitioning". HBlast presents improved scalability over existing solutions and well balanced computational work load while keeping database segmentation and recompilation to a minimum. Enhanced BLAST search performance on cheap memory constrained hardware has significant implications for in field clinical diagnostic testing; enabling faster and more accurate identification of pathogenic DNA in human blood or tissue samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 42 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Engineering 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Informatics
#521
of 2,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,973
of 359,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Informatics
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.