| Title |
Do Molecular Clocks Run at All? A Critique of Molecular Systematics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Theory, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.357 |
| Authors |
Jeffrey H. Schwartz, Bruno Maresca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 10 | 6% |
| Brazil | 7 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 142 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 120 | 70% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,299,735
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Biological Theory
#141
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,160
of 267,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Theory
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.