↓ Skip to main content

Psychotropic medication use for behavioral symptoms of dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Psychotropic medication use for behavioral symptoms of dementia
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11910-006-0051-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip S. Wang, M. Alan Brookhart, Soko Setoguchi, Amanda R. Patrick, Sebastian Schneeweiss

Abstract

Behavioral disturbances associated with dementia are common and burdensome. Although no psychotropic medications are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat such behavioral symptoms, a variety of drug classes are commonly used for these purposes. Atypical antipsychotic medications may be somewhat effective and are generally considered the pharmacologic treatments of choice; however "black box" warnings have recently been added to their labels by the FDA, warning of significantly increased risks of short-term mortality. Older conventional antipsychotic medications may also be somewhat effective but appear to pose risks that can be at least as great as those of the newer atypical drugs. Although antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists may be considered, particularly in patients with specific types of symptomatology, even less is known about their effectiveness and safety. Also, although various psychotropic medications used for behavioral disturbances in dementia patients may be somewhat effective, they have been increasingly associated with important safety risks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Unspecified 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#392
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,117
of 69,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.