↓ Skip to main content

Ford revisited: A critical review of the chronology and relationships of the earliest ceramic complexes in the New World, 6000-1500 B.C.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of World Prehistory, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ford revisited: A critical review of the chronology and relationships of the earliest ceramic complexes in the New World, 6000-1500 B.C.
Published in
Journal of World Prehistory, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02221836
Authors

John W. Hoopes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 33%
Arts and Humanities 12 21%
Environmental Science 7 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,729,343
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Journal of World Prehistory
#104
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,617
of 22,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of World Prehistory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them