↓ Skip to main content

Functional cellulose fibers via polycarboxylic acid/carbon nanotube composite coating

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Functional cellulose fibers via polycarboxylic acid/carbon nanotube composite coating
Published in
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11998-012-9429-3
Authors

Farbod Alimohammadi, Mazeyar Parvinzadeh Gashti, Ali Shamei

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 29%
Chemistry 7 20%
Chemical Engineering 3 9%
Materials Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Coatings Technology and Research
#57
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,329
of 166,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Coatings Technology and Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them