| Title |
Modeling carbon stores in Oregon and Washington forest products: 1900–1992
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, August 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00141703 |
| Authors |
Mark E. Harmon, Janice M. Harmon, William K. Ferrell, David Brooks |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,621,289
of 24,187,394 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#940
of 5,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#499
of 30,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.